Prohibition is still to be achieved in the home, alternative care settings and day care.
We have been unable to find out if legislation confirms a right of parents and others with parental authority to administer corporal punishment in the guise of “reasonable chastisement” or similar. The near universal acceptance of a certain degree of violence in childrearing necessitates clarity in law that all degrees and kinds of corporal punishment are unacceptable and unlawful. Prohibition should be enacted of all corporal punishment, however light, by parents and other adults with parental authority.
Alternative care settings – Prohibition should be enacted in legislation applicable to all alternative care settings (foster care, institutions, places of safety, emergency care, etc).
Day care – Corporal punishment should be prohibited in all early childhood care (nurseries, crèches, family centres, etc) and all day care for older children (day centres, after-school childcare, childminding, etc).
Corporal punishment is lawful in the home. There appears to be no defence for the use of corporal punishment in childrearing in the Penal Code 1963 or the Civil Code 1972, but provisions against violence and abuse in these and other laws are not interpreted as prohibiting corporal punishment of children.
In reporting in 2012 on the UPR recommendation to prohibit corporal punishment made in 2008, the Government stated that the Ministry of Social Affairs is developing a code of social action but went on to suggest that corporal punishment is punishable under existing law. Law no. 2016/28 on the Code of Social Protection was enacted in 2017 to replace the Code of Social Security 1975 and does not address corporal punishment. In reporting to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in 2013, the Government referred to the preparation of a new Family Code. In 2015, the Government reported that the drafting of the Family Code had been initiated. As at March 2017, the draft Family Code had not been finalised.
A Children’s Code is also being drafted with the support of UNICEF. In January 2017, the draft Children’s Code was transmitted to the State Council (Conseil d’Etat) for technical validation before being presented to the Parliament. As it currently stands, the Children’s Code would repeal and replace the Law on the Judicial Regime of Protection of Children 2010. As of March 2017, the draft Children’s Code would prohibit “all forms of physical and psychological violence against the child” (unofficial translation) but would not prohibit all corporal punishment in all settings. Article 79 of the Law on the Judicial Regime of Protection of Children 2010, which prohibits the use of corporal punishment in penal institutions, is currently contained in the draft Children’s Code.
In reporting to the African Committee of Experts on the Rights and Welfare of the Child in 2015, the Government stated that customary practices regarding corporal punishment still exist and that challenging this “is seen as an interference in the private life of the family”. The Government went on to report measures to prohibit corporal punishment only in relation to schools. The report confirmed, too, that there is no legislation on domestic violence.
Alternative care settings
There is no explicit prohibition of corporal punishment in alternative care settings.
Corporal punishment is unlawful in preschool provision under article 108 of the Law on Orientation of Education, Training and Research 2011 (see under “Schools”), but it is not explicitly prohibited in other early childhood care and in day care for older children.
Corporal punishment is unlawful in schools under article 108 of the Law on Orientation of Education, Training and Research 2011, which came into force in February 2012 (unofficial translation): “Prohibited in schools and universities: Punishment or abuse and other forms of violence or humiliation….” In reporting to the African Committee of Experts on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, the Government noted the “adoption of an order of the Ministry of Education prohibiting corporal punishment in schools”.
Corporal punishment is explicitly prohibited as a disciplinary measure in penal institutions in article 79 of the Law on the Judicial Regime of Protection of Children 2010 (unofficial translation): “Any action or disciplinary proceedings again a minor must be compatible with respect for dignity. It is forbidden, even for disciplinary reasons, to impose a juvenile detainee to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, including corporal punishment, confinement in a dark cell in a dungeon or in isolation, or any other punishment that may prejudice his physical or mental health.” This article is included in the draft Children’s Code, which is set to replace the Law on the Judicial Regime of Protection of Children 2010.
Sentence for crime
Corporal punishment is unlawful as a sentence for crime. There is no provision for judicial corporal punishment in criminal law.
Universal Periodic Review of Gabon’s human rights record
Gabon was examined in the first cycle of the Universal Periodic Review in 2008 (session 2). The following recommendation was made:
“To prohibit by law the worst forms of corporal punishment of children in all places (Mexico)”
The Government neither accepted nor rejected the recommendation.
Examination in the second cycle took place in 2012 (session 14). In its national report, the Government stated that the Ministry of Social Affairs is developing a code of social action, that research on violence against children in Gabon has been conducted, that corporal punishment is unlawful under the Penal Code, and that in 2010-2011 awareness raising campaigns were carried out aiming to address the worst form of corporal punishment in schools. During the review the following recommendations were made and were accepted by the Government:
“Continue public awareness programmes against corporal punishment of children in schools (Angola);
“Develop and implement a comprehensive national strategy to fight the worst forms of corporal punishment of children (Belarus)”
Committee on the Rights of the Child, Concluding Observations
Session 072 (2016)
(3 June 2016, CRC/C/GAB/CO/2, Concluding observations on second report, paras. 30 and 31)
"The Committee is seriously concerned that corporal punishment of children is not prohibited in all settings, namely in the home and in alternative and day care settings, and that the practice of corporal punishment to discipline children is still accepted and widespread.
"In the light of its general comment No. 8 (2006) on corporal punishment, the Committee urges the State Party to prohibit all corporal punishment of children in all settings, including the home, alternative and day care settings, and to promote positive, non-violent and participatory forms of child-rearing and discipline among parents as well as alternative and day care personnel."Read more from Session 072 (2016)
Session 029 (2002)
(1 February 2002, CRC/C/15/Add.171, Concluding observations on initial report, paras. 40 and 54)
"The Committee recommends the State party to … undertake a study on violence, including sexual violence, against children within the family, at schools and in other institutions to assess the scope, nature and causes of these practices in order to adopt and implement a comprehensive plan of action, effective measures and policies in conformity with article 19 of the Convention, and to contribute to changing attitudes; … take all necessary steps to introduce the legal prohibition of the use of corporal punishment in schools and other institutions and at home;…
"The Committee recommends that the State party … implement the ban of corporal punishment at schools and train teachers with alternative measures of discipline…."Read more from Session 029 (2002)
Committee Against Torture, Concluding Observations
CAT session 049 (2012)
(17 January 2013, CAT/C/GAB/CO/1, Concluding observations on initial report, paras. 25 and 26)
"While taking note of the information provided by the State party’s delegation which indicates that children are safeguarded by the Minors Protection Code, by the law on domestic, school-related and institutional violence and by the awareness campaigns conducted in Libreville, Owendo, Makokou and Oyem on the worst forms of corporal punishment inflicted upon schoolchildren, the Committee is concerned by reports indicating that corporal punishment continues to be practised in homes and schools. (art. 16)
The State party should takes steps to ensure the effective enforcement of its legislation in order to make certain that corporal punishment is not practised under any circumstances. It should also step up its campaigns aimed at raising public awareness about the harmful effects of corporal punishment and about the fact that it is prohibited.
"The Committee regrets … the fact that it does not have full, reliable information on … corporal punishment ....
The State party should compile statistics that can be used to assess the application of the Convention at the national level. ... Statistics should also be provided on … corporal punishment .…"Read more from CAT session 049 (2012)
African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, Concluding Observations
Session 26 (2015)
([November 2015], Concluding observations on initial report, para. 26)
“The Committee welcomes the enactment of the 2008 Law on Sexual Violence and Female Gentile Mutilation. However, it is noted that violence and abuse against children is predominant within the family. Therefore, the Committee recommends the State Party to ban corporeal punishment in all settings. Moreover, the Committee recommends the State Party to put in place a child friendly and accessible reporting and rehabilitation mechanism for child victims.”Read more from Session 26 (2015)
Prevalence/attitudinal research for Gabon in the last 10 years
 6 August 2012, A/HRC/WG.6/14/GAB/1, National report to the UPR, para. 48
 14 July 2014, CRPD/C/GAB/1, Initial state party report, para. 121
 Gabon government delegation reporting to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, http://www.unog.ch/unog/website/news_media.nsf/%28httpNewsByYear_en%29/03CCC7A42C292BC7C1257EA800462478?OpenDocument, accessed 1 September 2015
 Information provided in correspondence with the Global Initiative, 30 January 2015
 , Initial state party report
 Law No. 21/2011
 , Initial state party report
 28 May 2008, A/HRC/8/35, Report of the working group, para. 60(15)
 6 August 2012, A/HRC/WG.6/14/GAB/1, National report to the UPR, para. 48
 13 December 2012, A/HRC/22/5, Report of the working group, paras. 101(31) and 101(69)